Welcome to the linuxcrusade.com.
| More filings in Novell: SCO's Reply Memo re June 4 Motion (258) and Exhibits |
|
More filings by SCO in Novell, including a Reply Memorandum [PDF] and a Supplemental Declaration by Edward Normand [PDF] with exhibits regarding SCO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its 1st, 2nd and 5th Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's 1st Counterclaim [PDF]. That last is the one on slander of title. So the theme, once again, is who owns the copyrights? Did the APA and Amendments (and Bill of Sale, according to SCO) give the UNIX copyrights to Santa Cruz, or does Novell still own them? Here's Novell's Memorandum in Opposition [PDF] to this motion, and I have it as text now and will be posting it next. I see one header in the Reply Memo, "The Testimony of Attorneys David Bradford and Tor Braham Regarding the Original APA Is Beside the Point." No kidding? Considering they were the two lawyers for Novell on the deal in question in this litigation, that should be fascinating. Let's look and see how SCO is thinking and whether it makes sense. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
